The school counseling profession got some good news this week. Following a years-long trend, the national student-counselor ratio dropped again last year, now standing at 372-1. While some states saw increases, the high school counselor range fell to 195-224, the first time it’s fallen within the ASCA recommended ratio of 250 to 1.
The benefits of a smaller ratio tend to speak for themselves. Fewer students on a caseload tends to mean more time with each student on a caseload, as well as more time to develop group guidance activities, outreach to parents, and creation of a counseling curriculum. Given the significant increase for mental health counseling since COVID, these innovations go a long way to meeting the needs families have come to count on counselors to fulfill.
This good news is certainly cause to celebrate, but it is also a time to exercise some caution:
Middle school and elementary ratios It’s not hard to do the math here—if high school ratios are below the national average of 372, that means middle and elementary school ratios are way above the national average. Given the joyous nature of young children, it’s hard to see why schools don’t understand the need for counselors in younger grades. It’s time to keep singing that song.
Beware of cuts, Part One You can bet counselors aren’t the only ones noticing the drop in ratios. That means school administrators may be looking at this and thinking, geez, if we have fewer students, maybe we can live with fewer counselors. If you have a retiree or departing counselor in your midst, make sure you keep a close eye on efforts to replace them. Otherwise, your ratios go right back up.
Beware of cuts, Part Two The other way counseling departments get cut is by administrators deciding there are more non-professional duties counselors can do, now that they have all this “free time”. There’s always one time of year when extra duties are doled out. If you don’t know when that is, see if you can find out, and make sure you aren’t on the list for getting an extra helping of bus duty.
Develop something tangible I get it—the first thing you want to do as a counselor is better serve your students. To most counselors, this means more individual services and meetings, an idea that makes perfect sense; since growth in life is individual, plans for growth in life should be individual, too.
That said, it’s important to remember public perception of counselors is mixed at best, and that’s largely due to the nature of our work. We can’t exactly send an email blast to all families saying, “And this week in the counseling office, Josephine overcame her shyness, Bill finally quit smoking, and Steve and Julie patched up their broken relationship.” On the other hand, if we don’t make some effort at promoting the work we do, it’s sometimes perceived as mysterious, and support for that work diminishes—and, as a result, so does the emotional and fiscal support we receive.
One way to meet this need is program development. Since a recent survey showed less than a third of public high schools had a college counseling curriculum, now might be the time to use some of this ratio reduction to create guidance structures everyone can see and take advantage of. The bonus here is that this strengthened curriculum means less time in individual meetings discussing general issues, and more time focusing on individual student needs. If you’re looking for a college counseling curriculum that’s good to go, try this one.





